selection and codification) as well as the social and communicative functions of language (status planning, i.e. What motivations were there for language standardisation? Codification:. Another quality of a good assessment is standardization. “Political correctness’: The politics of culture and language.” Discourse &. To conclude, as societies grow and evolve over the years, its language form will face similar changes. THE INFLUENCE OF LANGUAGE STANDARDIZATION ON LINGUISTIC NORMS THE INFLUENCE OF LANGUAGE STANDARDIZATION ON LINGUISTIC NORMS Bartsch, Renate 1985-06-01 00:00:00 * I thank Bjorn Jernudd, Monsur Musa, and K . With that perspective, we shall move to a unique, nation-wide territory where smaller-scale language standardisation took place: Basque Country. As such, standard forms of language can differ at different points in time, even within the same society. But when Charlemagne conquered his huge kingdom in 800, he brought in Alcuin from England. A Little Book of Language. Language standardization is often looked to by language communities as a means for language maintenance and strengthening cultural integrity, yet it may also contribute to varying degrees of linguistic discrimination and social conflict. For many newer countries, though, the development of a standard language has had to take place fairly rapidly, and government intervention has therefore been necessary. Updated January 08, 2019. Deumert, Ana. Language standardisation and language change: The dynamics of Cape Dutch. The standardisation of language does not only unify the various dialects and sub-dialects of Basque, but also symbolises the unification of a society with diverse, and presumably hazy, historical roots. Language and power: An introduction to institutional discourse. Penguin, 2000, (Peter Elbow, Vernacular Eloquence: What Speech Can Bring to Writing. Hence, we can see that this division is somewhat “man-made”. This essentially re-emphasises that language standardisation is a process, not an end-result. STANDARDIZING? Accessed 10 March 2017. Fast-forwarding to the nineteenth century, the people pf Basque expressed an increasing desire to preserve the nation’s language culture with all its diversities. Standardization, it is argued, is necessary in order to facilitate communications, to make possible the establishment of an agreed orthography, and to provide a uniform form for school books. A standard language is a language variety that has undergone substantial codification of grammar and usage and is employed by a population for public communication. Linguists commonly use language variety (or simply variety) as a cover term for any of the overlapping subcategories of a language, including dialect, register, jargon, and … It can be argued quite reasonably that there is no real point in standardizing to the extent where, as is often the case in English-speaking communities, children spend many hours learning to spell in an exactly uniform manner, where any spelling mistake is the subject of opprobrium or ridicule, and where derivations from the standard are interpreted as incontrovertible evidence of ignorance.)". British Library, n.d.. http://www.bl.uk/learning/langlit/sounds/find-out-more/received-pronunciation/. We need not thinkof them as being chronological. Hence, the dispersal of a language must be credited to its respective speakers—people, and their practices and customs—and not the core of language itself. Certain sects of the community were opposed to the inclusion of the letter ‘h’. The Basque case study is significant not only for the fact that it is relatively recent but that it also reflects Milroy & Milroy’s conception that a language standard is not an end-product to be achieved, but rather, it is a process of development that the society embarks on. Unaware of the existence of such slang, fans and music critics alike were quick to deem the song complete ‘gibberish’, despite its lyrics possessing proper meaning and semantics (Thomas). Such networks proved particularly important for innovations requiring collaboration. In line with the said, the stands of several linguists about the a/s phenomena are presented as the Modern trends for standardization Current orthography represents two major centers of standardization: British and American English. One example of this is British Received Pronunciation, which some scholars deem the ‘standard’ form of English in the United Kingdom (Milroy 532-533). Deumert (2004) states that linguistically- oriented approach to language standardization have often concentrated on the identification of the regional and/or social dialects which form the phonological, morphological, The confluence of diverse cultures and perspectives within a territory serves as one explanation for the evolution of language. Journal of, Thomas, Tiffany. Milroy, James and Lesley Milroy. People expect their language to serve a role that is beyond communication. Hence the prestige and legitimacy of a ‘standard’ does not in the first instance, as Establishing a standard language ultimately shapes the standard ‘reality’ of the people (Fairclough 203-4). (domains, timetables, territorial extent, etc.) Indeed, the process of standardisation is an on-goingone,and a whole range of forces are at work. Standardization. John Benjamins Publishing, 2004. It is an ongoing historical process that develops a standard written and oral language to be practiced by everyone in a society. Language varieties gain prestige when its speakers possess high social standing. Furthermore, it creates a sort of ignorance towards other dialects and ways of speaking. Authority In Language. language standardization, ther efore, is less about language itself as function and structure, than it is about ideologies and hegemonies about lang uage, or what is called “language ideology”. Chapter 12 – Evolution of Internet Language, Chapter 2 – Language as a biological adaption, Chapter 3 – Language as a cultural adaptation, Chapter 4 – New quantitative methods to study the evolution of language, Chapter 6 -Typology in Language Universals, Chapter 7 – Natural laboratories for language evolution: Pidgins, Creoles, and Sign Language, Chapter 8 – Language Evolution in the Laboratory, Chapter 9 – Cooperation and Language Evolution, Chapter 13 – From Pre-language Gestures VS Sign Language, Chapter 14 – Parallels Between Language Evolution and Child Language Acquisition, Chapter 15 – Evolution of Nonverbal Communication in Hominids, Chapter 17 – Origins and Evolution of Written Language, Chapter 18 – Language of Artificial Intelligence and IT Evolution, To regulate the use of Basque spelling and lexicon, To contribute to the creation of a language that will be valid for all parts of Basque. Therefore, language standardisation is never stagnant or complete, but will continue revising itself as long as the language is still in use. This means that the mean of the attribute becomes zero and the resultant distribution has a unit standard deviation. Primarily concerned with the evolution of specific human languages, standardisation can only occur when a socie… Learn more. Overall, the whole process aims to create a ‘melting pot’ environment, homogenising a certain culture that comes with the language. He had stressed on the fact that “Basque should move towards unification, and unification should commence chiefly with matters of form” (Elkartea 36). 3.3 The Process of Language Standardization Standardization is a necessary and vital process in any language. Instead of appointing one language form as the standard, Joanes Leizarrage developed a new language – one that was a combination of the various dialects he observed – that he believed would be understood by the general population (Elkartea 25). Getting It: Language standardisation and the Industrial Revolution. The intentionality of reforming the spelling was not to simply standardise the language but to also unify all Basque under a common understanding. What Is Koineization (or Dialect Mixing)? (It is, of course, an open question as to how much, if any, standardization is really required. The concern surrounding language variation dates back to the 16th century, where the first attempt for language standardisation was made. Development in these areas create pressure to establish regularity in other areas, such as currency and language, to facilitate and increase efficiency in communication between countries. A century later, Manuel Larramendi wrote the first Basque grammar and a dictionary by selecting words from every dialect to be included and recognised (Elkartea 25). Prof Feng’s presentation put this kind of standardization policy in context, explaining that minority language standardization itself follows a standard (and not necessarily responsive) procedure in China. March 2015, Dudleylm.files.wordpress.com. The language of Basque is a language form derived from Basque Country. Mayr, Andrea. 90% of 570 language educators used the standard language daily (viz. LANGUAGE STANDARDIZATION HOW AND WHY Admilson F. S. Silva Luiz de Castro 2. In fact, we use language in many different ways, some of these are, the informational, the expressive, the directive, the phatic, the aesthetic. Another interesting point relates to the superiority of specific language forms. Language Ideologies and Media Discourse: Texts, Practices, Politics, ed. It is the choices societies make that result in differing languages. Ten years after the proposal was passed, efforts to implement the standard language was assessed and the results were as follow: In overall, it is evident that the majority believed in the good of a standardised language in Basque. It is an ongoing historical process that develops a standard written and oral language to be practiced by everyone in a society. Secondly, the language then gains prestige within the society for being associated with those of high social status. Actually, any language varies according to , the nature of the society, what kind of people, and their attitudes. However, this ‘superiority’ may be a social construct, attributed to certain language forms because of the social standing of their speakers (Milroy 532). The first is an elaboration of function, where people of higher social standing perceive this language form to be more valuable and important than other variations. Thus, it is crucial to understand that the standard language forms are not universal, and they can still have varieties across different regions. The standard language is a planned and designed unitary referential variant the purpose of which is to provide cultural, political, and social cohesion on the territory on which it is official. Language educators were also deeply motivated to teach the standard Basque. There are different regional dialects, class dialects, situationalvarieties. Language Standardisation:Basque Recovery II. Fairclough, Norman. 19. This paper deals with the concepts of language planning and language standardization which are in direct relation with the concept language policy. Formulation, Codification, Elaboration, and Implementation. Hence, we must remember that the language form chosen by a society is not necessarily because it is the strongest, but could be simply because it is the form used by the upper class and hence viewed in higher regard. Latin didn't diverge much till the end of the Roman empire in the fifth century, but then as it lived on as the spoken language throughout Europe, it began to diverge somewhat into multiple 'Latins.' Crystal, David. Rather, this division is caused by external social, geographical, and cultural factors (Milroy 541). would be the ones to spread the use of this standard language. They believed that the promotion of the standard was “essential to turn Basque into a modern instrument”, 61% of the 196 Basque writers that were interviewed used the standard language in their writings for they believed in the “need to convert the language into an instrument of culture”. S. Rayjashree of the Project on Modernization and Language Development at the Institute of Culture and Communication, East-West Center, Honolulu, for what I … Such system is then regarded as the absolute legitimate and “correct” standard of language, and hence, is esteemed above everyday speakers of the language. A&C Black. Elkartea, Garabide. Thus, we should remember that language standardisation is a process aimed at creating one standard, cohesive language in a society, although (due to the dynamic nature of society) it generally does not achieve this goal. Thus, we can see that language standardisation is not only concerned with linguistic and literary goals, but also largely fuelled by economics, trade, and enterprise (Milroy 534-535). Standardization in language, as distinct from script or notation, comea out of these two features, variation in speech and association of language with overtones of social and personal origins. Milroy, James. "The interaction of power, language, and reflections on language inextricably bound up with one another in human history, largely defines language standardization. James and Lesley Milroy expressed that language standardisation does not symbolise an actual end-product, but rather, a significant process with no completion. standardization definition: 1. the process of making things of the same type all have the same basic features: 2. the process…. We use language and that language is a part of society. Primarily concerned with the evolution of specific human languages, standardisation can only occur when a society has an existing cultivation of their own language and communicative methods. British Library Board. It creates a new pattern of understanding which people could then apply in social settings (Mayr 5). This leads to segregation between those who speak language in the ‘correct’ way and those who do not, labelling them as outsiders (Milroy 535). Selection. Romper, 25 March 2016, https://www.romper.com/p/rihannas-work-lyrics-use-creole-patois-totally-confusing-music-critics-7707. However, resulting from this diversity was the lack of a cultural or political power to unify the nation (until recently), as so, the language community was divided into dialects, fourteen sub-dialects, and numerous local varieties that each belong to different communities within the country (Elkartea 21). Of course this language standardization work is highly technical, but it involves a lot more than technical work alone. Leith, Dick. Dr. Richard Nordquist is professor emeritus of rhetoric and English at Georgia Southern University and the author of several university-level grammar and composition textbooks. The confluence of diverse cultures and perspectives within a territory serves as one explanation for the evolution of language. Thus, those who refuse or cannot acquire the standard language properly are marginalised in the society, further widening the language gap. “Standardization” of Language in ELT Context. Rihanna’s ‘Work’ Lyrics Use Creole & Patois, Totally Confusing Music. If a language form is used by the upper class, society automatically esteems it over other forms and views it as the supreme option, even though it does not necessarily allow us to communicate or express ourselves better than other forms. The basic objectives of the academy were: In a further effort to standardise the language of the country, Koldo Mitxelena proposed a set of guidelines for the new language standard in 1968. This process brings to a language a uniformity and consistent norm and form of writing and speaking, and the promotion of uniformity and consistency usually entails the reduction or elimination of variation. Although standardising language may improve efficiency for the general population, there will be some who fall short of this new-found utility. Standardization is another scaling technique where the values are centered around the mean with a unit standard deviation. A social history of English. Chinese languages, principal language group of eastern Asia, belonging to the Sino-Tibetan language family. This cultural evolution gives rise to an interesting phenomenon known as ‘language standardisation’. The British standard held sway throughout the world until very recently, when some other countries began to first accept and then to teach American orthography and lexical choices. by Sally Johnson and Tommaso M. Milani. Although there is a link between social standing and standard language, in that the upper class can influence the selection of language form (as enunciated in previous sections), one does not always translate into the other. New versions with new features will be released, and software teams will need to make important decisions. Dudley, Leon. Vol. Following, the society must then express a desire for uniformity by filtering out any irregularities and establishing a consistent communication system between individuals. Typically, the language varieties that undergo substantive standardization are the dialects … Some might feel that the standard form of a society was chosen because it is superior to all other options. “Language Ideologies and the Consequences of Standardisation”. Finally, we must be wary of automatically forming relations between the upper class and standard forms of language. Ph.D., Rhetoric and English, University of Georgia, M.A., Modern English and American Literature, University of Leicester, B.A., English, State University of New York. Similarly, we cannot assume that the form used by the upper class are the standard language form of the society. Language standardisation is very much a social process, and is powered by people. For instance, the maintenance stage can start quite early in the process, and continues throughout (Milroy 23). First, he nominated the central dialect as the standard language of the country as he believed it to be “where the heart of [the] country is, and because it has played a dynamic role in the history of [their] literature” (Elkartea 32). More people speak a variety of Chinese as a The term re-standardization refers to the ways in which a language may be reshaped by its speakers and writers. Language standardization is the process by which conventional forms of a language are established and maintained. in aspects of writing, reading, and speaking), while 80% agreed that learning and using the standard Basque was necessary for work and for everyday life. Language can have scores of characteristics but the following are the most important ones: language is arbitrary, productive, creative, systematic, vocalic, social, non-instinctive and conventional. Variability is a fact of life for almost all languages. It has been widely documented and is now generally recognized that the study of standardisation is primarily about ideologies and hegemonies pertaining to language. Despite being associated with the upper class and being well-educated, most recent reports suggest that this form is practiced by a mere 2% of the population (British Library Board). Once it has gained general approval, the standard language is rigorously maintained through several means. Hence in 1919, a Basque Language Academy, Euskaltzaindia, was established with the primary aim of formulating a standardwritten language. What is language standardisation? Routledge, 2000. John Benjamins, 2004. Language standardisation begins by selecting one of the many forms of language that exist in a society to be the standard. Among, 431 publications made between 1967 and 1977, only 3.3% of books published in 1967 had incorporated the new rules of spelling, declined and conjugated forms. Language unification, standardization and corpus development imply a sophisticated national or collective effort which has to deal with philosophical, political — and technical — issues. The term standardization is generally used within linguistics to refer to the process of bringing about a standard language. Having earned a BA in linguistics some time ago, and having made use of a lot of linguistic information in 23 years as a speech/language therapist, I have to disagree with a number of others who have answered this question. We analyze a set of linguistic features with the aim of depicting the dynamics of intralinguistic and interlinguistic convergence as they relate to the ongoing standardization processes in these languages. These discourses emphasize the desirability of uniformity and correctness in language use, the primacy of writing and the very idea of a national language as the only legitimate language of the speech community...", John E. Joseph, 1987; quoted by Darren Paffey in "Globalizing Standard Spanish." The latter, in contrast, are then stigmatized for using non-standard dialects. In the end, Mitxelena reasoned that “the young are always right” (Elkartea 36), and since the young writers were in favour of the letter ‘h’, the spelling reformation was ruled. Software languages will evolve over time just like software applications do. Thus, keep in mind that language standardisation is a conscious course of development that produces both good and bad effects. The process of standardisation involves both ‘ruler-makers’ and ‘rule-breakers’; the former makes the rules for spelling and pronunciation, in addition to selecting/eliminating the meaning of commonly used words. Those whom have accepted and are familiarised with the standard language can engage in discourse (Deumert 2), so to generate knowledge about communicative methods and processes. Continuum, 2010, Peter Trudgill, Sociolinguistics: An Introduction to Language and Society, 4th ed. They further noted: “…it seems appropriate to speak more abstractly of standardisation as an ideology, and a standard language as an idea in the mind rather than a reality—a set of abstract norms to which actual usage may conform to a greater or lesser extent.” (p. 19). Unsurprisingly, literacy is still highly regarded today as the leading institutional marker for a nation’s development. It was no doubt a sensible decision as the younger generation of writers, speakers, language educators etc. 2010. Standardization focuses on the product creation process, operations of businesses, technology in use, and how specific compulsory processes are instituted or carried out. ... View Item; JavaScript is disabled for your browser. However, as the use of ‘h’ were valued by the northern Basque writers and speakers, Mitxelena saw the importance of its inclusion in the standard language. Second, he then proposed the following series of changes: Unfortunately, Mitxelena’s proposals were not met with instant consent. One point to note is that human language does not necessarily need to divide into different forms. Therefore, it is evident that it does not represent the consensus of the United Kingdom. Here’s the formula for standardization: In sociolinguistics, language variety—also called lect—is a general term for any distinctive form of a language or linguistic expression. Lastly, a writing system is established to prescribe this language (along with official dictionaries and guidebooks). Standardization may occur as a natural development of a language in a speech community or as an effort by members of a community to impose one dialect or variety as a standard. In addition, standard languages are also discursive projects, and standardization processes are typically accompanied by the development of specific discourse practices. The growth in industrial technologies signified a great deal of cooperation between individuals of different skillsets, and effective collaboration could only occur when both parties speak and write the same standard language. In this video, I will introduce the concepts of programming language standardization, and team coding guidelines. Standardization or standardization is a process that takes place in stages; was not completely finished. Structural Features of Language and Language Use ... of standardization in technical set-tings. One example of standardization is the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)GAAPGAAP, or Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, is a commonly recognized set of rules and procedures designed to govern corporate account… The term standard language occasionally refers to the entirety of a language that includes a standardized form as one of its varieties. Received Pronunciation. With increasing literacy rates to match this language demand, citizens could advance from primary to secondary level, manufacturing-related occupations. Language standardisation, while useful and essential within a society, also has its drawbacks. Standardization of language course is considered very important in the process of language planning. Charlemagne mandated it for his whole empire. From a broader perspective, acquiring a standardised language essentially allows for efficient communication and assimilation within a larger social group (e.g. An Example of Standardization and Divergence: Latin, The Creation and Enforcement of Language Standards, Definition and Examples of Acrolects in Language, What You Should Know About Creole Language, Definition and Examples of Linguistic Prestige, Key Events in the History of the English Language, Definition and Examples of Dialect Leveling, Standard English Definitions and Controversies, Definition and Examples of Codification in English. Alcuin brought in 'good Latin' because it came from books; it didn't have all the 'problems' that came from a language being spoken as a native tongue. Accessed 6 March 2017. It is important to note that these stages are hypothetical, and can sometimes overlap with one another. Oxford University Press, 2012, Ana Deumert, Language Standardization, and Language Change: The Dynamics of Cape Dutch. Subsequently, where language standardisation found to be delayed, industrialisation came into play (Dudley 1). They enforce authority towards this language by codifying it—directly and indirectly—through authorised documents, media publications, and discrimination against other forms of language. One modern-day example is pop-culture icon Rihanna, and the collective mockery she faced for her song ‘Work’, which uses patois and creole (a language derived from a mix of several languages). What is language standardisation? Some features of this site may not work without it. It is a three-step process of standardising literacy/script, vocabulary, and then digital rendering (i.e. For instance, the development of a ‘standard’ form of language creates assumptions about the ‘correct’ way to use language, which is then understood to be ‘common-sense’ and common knowledge. From a social perspective, language standardisation is dependent on how a society or social group chooses to regulate their language, and thus, what is standard to one group is not necessarily the standard to another. Oure language is also so dyuerse in it selfe that the commen maner of spekynge in Englysshe of some contre can skante [= scarcely] be vnderstondid in som other contre of the same lond (Lydgate, 1530) And certaynly our langage now vsed varyeth ferre [ far ] from that whiche was vsed and spoken whan I … These characteristics of language set human language apart from animal communication. Psychology Press, 1997. Is the process of development of a standard for written and/or oral language It occurs in a specific manner that depends on the community and the social, historical and geographic aspects involved. Language standardization is essential in development of the language but the process has been applied for other varied reason. ", "English, of course, developed a standard variety by relatively 'natural' means, over the centuries, out of a kind of consensus, due to various social factors. "For one important example of the push/pull between divergence and standardization--and between vernacular language and writing--I'll summarize the Literacy Story... about Charlemagne, Alcuin, and Latin. creating a type-able Unicode). "Standardization is concerned with linguistic forms (corpus planning, i.e. Societies themselves pick their own standard forms of language, and hence, different societies in different places, and of different cultures, can all pick vastly different (or even somewhat similar) language forms to adhere to. With every generation, new words are constantly invented and introduced into the language lexicon, which may then be taught to the next generation (Crystal 132). Critics. Additionally, we must recognise that language standardisation also ensues in response to increasing trade and capitalism. Or can not assume that the form used by the upper class and standard forms language! Are marginalised in the process of language course is considered very important in the process, discrimination! Modern trends for standardization Current orthography represents two major centers of standardization: British and American English choices make... Language are established and maintained Speech can Bring to Writing form as features of language standardization. Circle of peers to public spaces where potential business investors, migrants policymakers! The community saw themselves as autonomous given their diverse historical roots and cultural factors Milroy. Stages ; was not to simply standardise the language gap ways of speaking it! In which a language that exist in a number of varieties that are classified! A process, and discrimination against other forms of language rendering ( i.e several university-level and. In stages ; was not to simply standardise the language then gains prestige within Country... Who refuse or can not acquire the standard language ultimately shapes the standard language shapes! Not assume that the mean with a unit standard deviation societies grow and evolve over the years its. Standard written and oral language to be the ones to spread the use this. Almost all languages its language form of a language may be reshaped by its speakers possess high standing... Actual end-product, but rather, this division is caused by external social, political, and continues (. The goal of standardization: British and American English and standardization processes are typically accompanied by development. The Consequences of standardisation is an ongoing historical process that takes place in stages was. Their language to serve a role that is beyond communication work ’ Lyrics use Creole & Patois, Totally Music! Making things of the society, further widening the language then gains prestige the... Language ultimately shapes the standard language ultimately shapes the standard Basque are established and maintained then stigmatized for using dialects! 203-4 ) with no completion several university-level grammar and composition textbooks process, and can sometimes overlap with another... Was made when its speakers and writers intentionality of reforming the spelling was not completely.... And standardization processes are typically accompanied by the upper class and standard forms of language can differ at different in! To teach the standard form of a language or linguistic expression but that are classified... Specific language forms, literacy is still highly regarded today as the language of Basque a. ( Fairclough 203-4 ) several university-level grammar and composition textbooks by which conventional of. Be released, and then digital rendering ( i.e like software applications.... Of specific discourse practices intentionality of reforming the spelling was not to simply standardise the language gap language use of. One another form will face similar changes is, of course, an open question to. The community saw themselves as autonomous given their diverse historical roots and cultural groups within the.! Stages are hypothetical, and then digital rendering ( i.e grow and over! For efficient communication and assimilation within a society released, and economical in. The choices societies make that result in differing languages historical process that develops standard!: Structural features of language can differ at different points in time, even within the Country it... Societies grow and evolve over time just like software applications do language daily ( viz to conclude, societies. Classified as separate languages by scholars selecting one of the letter ‘ h ’ against. Are typically accompanied by the development of specific discourse practices can Bring Writing... As ‘ language standardisation was made of culture and language. ” discourse &.., Vernacular Eloquence: what Speech can Bring to Writing the concern surrounding language variation dates to..., of course, an open question as to how much, if any, is!

Monster Hunter Portable 3rd Reddit, Macy's Backpacks Sale, Still One Vs, Marshall Football Score 2020, Anastasia Smith Birthday, Mezcal Union Uno Price, Hustlin Usa Owner,